@COMMENT This file was generated by bib2html.pl <https://sourceforge.net/projects/bib2html/> version 0.94
@COMMENT written by Patrick Riley <http://sourceforge.net/users/patstg/>
@COMMENT This file came from Gal A. Kaminka's publication pages at
@COMMENT http://www.cs.biu.ac.il/~galk/publications/
@Article{tcs11,
 author={Asaf Shiloni and Noa Agmon and Gal A. Kaminka},
 title = {Of Robot Ants and Elephants: A Computational Comparison},
 journal = {Theoretical Computer Science},
 year = {2011},
OPTkey = {},
volume = {412},
number = {41},
pages = {5771--5788},
OPTmonth = {},
  wwwnote = {}, 
  OPTnote = {},
OPTannote = {},
 abstract =  {In the robotics community, there exist implicit assumptions 
 concerning the computational capabilities of robots. Two \emph{computational 
 classes} of robots emerge as focal points of recent research: Robot \emph{Ants} and 
 robot \emph{Elephants}. Ants have poor memory and communication capabilities, 
 but are able to communicate using pheromones, in effect turning their work 
 area into a shared memory. By comparison, elephants are computationally stronger, 
 have large memory, and are equipped with strong sensing and communication 
 capabilities. Unfortunately, not much is known about the relation between the 
 capabilities of these models in terms of the tasks they can address. In this paper, 
 we present formal models of both ants and elephants, and investigate if one 
 dominates the other.  We present two algorithms: $\anteater$, which allows elephant 
 robots to execute ant algorithms; and $\elephantgun$, which converts elephant 
 algorithms---specified as Turing machines---into ant algorithms.  By exploring the 
 computational capabilities of these algorithms, we reach interesting conclusions 
  regarding the computational power of both models.}
}