@COMMENT This file was generated by bib2html.pl <https://sourceforge.net/projects/bib2html/> version 0.94
@COMMENT written by Patrick Riley <http://sourceforge.net/users/patstg/>
@COMMENT This file came from Gal A. Kaminka's publication pages at
@COMMENT http://www.cs.biu.ac.il/~galk/publications/
@InProceedings{rddps22position,
    author = {Eyal Weiss and Gal A. Kaminka},
    title = {Position Paper: Online Modeling for Offline Planning},
    year = {2022},
    booktitle = {{ICAPS}-22 Workshop on Reliable Data-Driven Planning and Scheduling ({RDDPS})},
    abstract = {The definition and representation of planning problems is at the heart of AI planning research. A key part is the representation of action models. Decades of advances improving declarative action model representations resulted in numerous theoretical advances, and capable, working, domain-independent planners. However, despite the maturity of the field, AI planning technology is still rarely used outside the research community, suggesting that current representations fail to capture real-world requirements, such as utilizing complex mathematical functions and models learned from data. We argue that this is because the modeling process is assumed to have taken place and completed prior to the planning process, i.e., offline modeling for offline planning. There are several challenges inherent to this approach, including: limited expressiveness of declarative modeling languages; early commitment to modeling choices and computation, that preclude using the most appropriate resolution for each action model -- which can only be known during planning; and difficulty in reliably using non-declarative, learned, models. 
        We therefore suggest to change the AI planning process, such that is carries out online modeling in offline planning, i.e., the use of action models that are computed or even generated as part of the planning process, as they are accessed. This generalizes the existing approach (offline modeling). The proposed definition admits novel planning processes, and we suggest one concrete implementation, demonstrating the approach. We sketch initial results that were obtained as part of a first attempt to follow this approach by planning with action cost estimators. We conclude by discussing open challenges. 
    }, 
}