@COMMENT This file was generated by bib2html.pl version 0.94 @COMMENT written by Patrick Riley @COMMENT This file came from Gal A. Kaminka's publication pages at @COMMENT http://www.cs.biu.ac.il/~galk/publications/ @InProceedings{acs16, author = {Mor Vered and Gal A. Kaminka and Sivan Biham}, title = {Online Goal Recognition through Mirroring: Humans and Agents}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive Systems}, OPTcrossref = {crossref}, OPTkey = {key}, OPTpages = {pages}, year = {2016}, OPTeditor = {editor}, OPTvolume = {volume}, OPTnumber = {number}, OPTseries = {series}, OPTaddress = {address}, OPTmonth = {month}, OPTorganization = {organization}, OPTpublisher = {publisher}, note = {A slightly modified version appears in Proceedings of the {IJCAI} 2016 workshop on Human-Agent Interaction Design and Models (HAIDM)}, OPTannote = {annote}, abstract = { Goal recognition is the problem of inferring the (unobserved) goal of an agent, based on a sequence of its observed actions. Inspired by mirroring processes in human brains, we advocate \emph{goal mirroring}, an online recognition approach that uses a black-box planner to generate recognition hypotheses. This approach avoids the prevalent assumption in current approaches, which rely on a dedicated \emph{plan library}, representing all known plans to achieve known goals. Such methods are inherently limited to the knowledge represented in the library. In this paper, we (i) describe a novel online goal mirroring algorithm for continuous spaces; (ii) evaluate a novel heuristic for choosing between competing recognition hypotheses; (iii) contrast machine and human recognition in two challenging domains, revealing insights as to human capabilities; and (iv) compare mirroring to library-based methods. }, wwwnote = {}, OPTkeywords = {}, }