Second PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge
(RTE-2)
Workshop Program
|
08:45-09:05 |
Opening
|
|
|
Michele Sebag, PASCAL Challenges Program
Manager Rodolfo Delmonte, PASCAL Challenges Workshop
Chair Ido Dagan, RTE-2 Organizer |
|
09:05-10:35 |
Session I
|
|
09:05-09:30 |
The Second PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge Roy Bar-Haim, Ido Dagan, Bill
Dolan, Lisa Ferro, Danilo Giampiccolo, Bernardo Magnini and Idan Szpektor [slides] |
|
9:30-10:10 Short presentations |
Machine Learning Experiments for Textual Entailment Diana Inkpen, Darren Kipp and Vivi Nastase [slides]
|
MLEnt: The Machine Learning Entailment System of the University of AlicanteZornitsa Kozareva and Andrés
Montoyo [slides]
|
|
|
An Approach Based on Logic Forms and WordNet Relationships to Textual Entailment Performance Ó. Ferrández, R. M. Terol, R. Muñoz, P. Martínez-Barco
and M. Palomar [slides]
|
|
|
10:10-10:35 |
Microsoft Research at RTE-2: Syntactic Contributions in the Entailment Task: an Implementation Lucy Vanderwende, Arul Menezes and Rion Snow [slides] |
|
10:35-11:10 |
Coffee break |
|
11:10-12:45 |
Session II |
|
11:10-11:50 Short presentations |
Using Maximal Embedded Syntactic Subtrees for Textual Entailment Recognition Sophia
Katrenko and Pieter Adriaans [slides] |
|
UNED at PASCAL RTE-2 Challenge Jesús Herrera, Anselmo Peñas, Álvaro Rodrigo and
Felisa Verdejo [slides] |
|
|
Toward Dependency Path Based Entailment Rodney D.
Nielsen, Wayne Ward and James H. Martin [slides] |
|
|
11:50-12:15 |
Learning Textual Entailment from Examples F.M. Zanzotto, A. Moschitti, M. Pennacchiotti and
M.T. Pazienza [slides] |
|
12:15-12:45 |
Panel I: Perspectives on Textual Entailment Panelists:
Sanda Harabagiu and Ido Dagan |
|
12:45-14:15 |
Lunch break |
|
14:15-15:45 |
Session III |
|
14:15-14:55 Short presentations |
Normalized Alignment of Dependency Trees for Detecting Textual Entailment Erwin Marsi, Emiel Krahmer, Wauter Bosma and Mariët
Theune [slides] |
|
Two Related Lexico-Syntactic Approaches to Entailment Vasile Rus [slides] |
|
|
Tree Edit Distance for Recognizing Textual Entailment: Estimating the Cost of Insertion Milen
Kouylekov and Bernardo Magnini [slides] |
|
|
14:55-15:20 |
Learning to Distinguish Valid Textual Entailments Marie-Catherine
de Marneffe, Bill MacCartney, Trond Grenager, Daniel Cer, Anna Rafferty and
Christopher D. Manning [slides] |
|
15:20-15:45 |
Recognizing Textual Entailment with LCC’s GROUNDHOG System Andrew Hickl,
John Williams, Jeremy Bensley, Kirk Roberts, Bryan Rink and Ying Shi [slides] |
|
15:45-16:20 |
Coffee break |
|
16:20-18:30 |
Session IV |
|
16:20-16:45 Short presentations |
Approaching Textual Entailment with LFG and FrameNet FramesAljoscha Burchardt and Anette Frank [slides]
|
|
Coping with Semantic Uncertainty with VENSES Rodolfo Delmonte, Antonella Bristot, Marco Aldo
Piccolino Boniforti and Sara Tonelli [slides] |
|
|
16:45-17:10 |
When Logical Inference
Helps Determining Textual Entailment (and When it Doesn’t) Johan Bos and
Katja Markert [slides] |
|
17:10-17:35 |
COGEX at the Second Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge Marta Tatu,
Brandon Iles, John Slavick, Adrian Novischi and Dan Moldovan [slides] |
|
17:35-18:30 |
Panel II: Goals and Dataset Proposals for RTE-3 Contributors:
Lisa Ferro, Vasile Rus, Anselmo Peñas, Johan Bos, Nicola Stokes |