The Second PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment

Challenge (RTE-2)

 

Challenge citation: Please use the following citation when referring to the RTE-2 challenge:

 

Roy Bar-Haim, Ido Dagan, Bill Dolan, Lisa Ferro, Danilo Giampiccolo, Bernardo Magnini and Idan Szpektor. 2006. The Second PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, Venice, Italy.

 

RTE-2 main website

 

Proceedings of the Workshop

 

Cover

Complete Proceedings

 

1.       The Second PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge 
Roy Bar-Haim, Ido Dagan, Bill Dolan, Lisa Ferro, Danilo Giampiccolo, Bernardo Magnini and Idan Szpektor

 

2.       Machine Learning Experiments for Textual Entailment
Diana Inkpen, Darren Kipp, and Vivi Nastase

 

3.      MLEnt: The Machine Learning Entailment System of the University of Alicante
Zornitsa Kozareva and Andrés Montoyo

 

4.        An approach based on Logic Forms and WordNet relationships to Textual Entailment performance       
Ó. Ferrández, R. M. Terol, R. Muñoz, P. Martínez-Barco and M. Palomar

 

5.       Microsoft Research at RTE-2: Syntactic Contributions in the Entailment Task: an implementation
Lucy Vanderwende, Arul Menezes and Rion Snow

 

6.       Using Maximal Embedded Syntactic Subtrees for Textual Entailment Recognition
Sophia Katrenko and Pieter Adriaans

 

7.       UNED at PASCAL RTE-2 Challenge 
Jesús Herrera, Anselmo Peñas, Álvaro Rodrigo and Felisa Verdejo

 

8.       Toward Dependency Path based Entailment 
Rodney D. Nielsen, Wayne Ward and James H. Martin

 

9.       Learning textual entailment from examples
F.M. Zanzotto, A. Moschitti, M. Pennacchiotti and M.T. Pazienza

 

10.   Normalized alignment of dependency trees for detecting textual entailment
Erwin Marsi, Emiel Krahmer, Wauter Bosma and Mariët Theune

 

11.   Two Related Lexico-Syntactic Approaches to Entailment 
Vasile Rus

 

12.   Tree Edit Distance for Recognizing Textual Entailment: Estimating the Cost of Insertion
Milen Kouylekov and Bernardo Magnini

 

13.   Learning to distinguish valid textual entailments 
Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Bill MacCartney, Trond Grenager, Daniel Cer, Anna Rafferty and Christopher D. Manning

 

14.   Recognizing Textual Entailment with LCC’s GROUNDHOG System 
Andrew Hickl, John Williams, Jeremy Bensley, Kirk Roberts, Bryan Rink and Ying Shi

 

15.   Coping with semantic uncertainty with VENSES
Rodolfo Delmonte, Antonella Bristot, Marco Aldo Piccolino Boniforti and Sara Tonelli

 

16.   Approaching Textual Entailment with LFG and FrameNet Frames 
Aljoscha Burchardt and Anette Frank

 

17.   When logical inference helps determining textual entailment (and when it doesn’t) 
Johan Bos and Katja Markert

 

18.   COGEX at the Second Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge 
Marta Tatu, Brandon Iles, John Slavick, Adrian Novischi and Dan Moldovan

 

19.   Componential Analysis for Recognizing Textual Entailment
Ken Litkowski

 

20.   Constructing a Decision Tree Classifier using Lexical and Syntactic Features
Eamonn Newman, John Dunnion and Joe Carthy

 

21.   Detecting Entailment Using an Extended Implementation of the Basic Elements Overlap Metric 
Jeremy Nicholson, Nicola Stokes and Timothy Baldwin

 

22.   Textual Entailment Through Extended Lexical Overlap
Rod Adams

 

23.   Meaning as Context and Subsequence Analysis for Entailment 
Daoud Clarke

 

24.   Word and tree-based similarities for textual entailment
Frank Schilder and Bridget Thomson McInnes